黄褐斑干预措施随机对照试验的系统评价:Cochrane综述节选版

2026-11-03 15:40:36 0

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on interventions for melasma: an abridged Cochrane review

黄褐斑干预措施随机对照试验的系统评价:Cochrane综述节选版

 


Background: Multiple treatments exist for melasma; they are often substandard and associated with side effects.

Objectives: We sought to assess the effectiveness of interventions used in the management of all types of melasma.

Methods: We undertook a systematic review using the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Results: We included 20 studies with a total of 2125 participants covering 23 different treatments. A meta-analysis was not possible because of the heterogeneity of treatments. Triple-combination cream (hydroquinone, tretinoin, and fluocinolone acetonide) was more effective at lightening melasma than hydroquinone alone (relative risk 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.26-1.97) or any of the agents in a dual-combination cream. Azelaic acid (20%) was significantly more effective than 2% hydroquinone (relative risk 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.48) at lightening melasma. In 2 studies where tretinoin was compared with placebo, objective measures demonstrated significant reductions in the severity. However, only in 1 study did participants rate a significant improvement (relative risk 13, 95% confidence interval 1.88-89.74).

Limitations: There was poor methodology, a lack of standardized outcome assessments, and short duration of studies.

Conclusions: The current limited evidence supports the efficacy of multiple interventions. Randomized controlled trials on well-defined participants with long-term outcomes are needed.



背景:黄褐斑存在多种治疗方法;这些方法往往不够理想,并伴有副作用。

目的:我们旨在评估用于管理所有类型黄褐斑的干预措施的有效性。

方法:我们采用Cochrane协作网的方法学开展了一项系统评价。

结果:我们纳入了20项研究,共2125名参与者,涵盖23种不同的治疗方法。由于治疗措施的异质性,无法进行Meta分析。三联乳膏(氢醌、维A酸和氟轻松)在淡化黄褐斑方面比单用氢醌(相对危险度1.58,95%置信区间1.26-1.97)或双联组合霜中的任一成分更有效。20%壬二酸在淡化黄褐斑方面显著优于2%氢醌(相对危险度1.25,95%置信区间1.06-1.48)。在2项将维A酸与安慰剂进行比较的研究中,客观指标显示严重程度显著降低。然而,仅在一项研究中参与者评价有显著改善(相对危险度13,95%置信区间1.88-89.74)。

局限性:方法学质量差、缺乏标准化的结局评估以及研究持续时间短。

结论:当前有限的证据支持多种干预措施的有效性。需要在定义明确的参与者中开展具有长期结局的随机对照试验。

 

Jutley GS, Rajaratnam R, Halpern J, Salim A, Emmett C. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on interventions for melasma: an abridged Cochrane review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Feb;70(2):369-73.


Systematic review of randomized .pdf


孚诺产品AI助手